Gasoline and diesel, like other crude oil products, are subject to the ups and downs of the international oil market. When addressing the sudden surge in fuel costs in America, our politicians tend to focus on OPEC, which is only partially the reason behind these price increases. Middle Eastern suppliers are major players in the United States oil market, but we tend to buy oil more consistently from countries in our neighborhood. Although OPEC controls the lion’s share of the world’s crude reserves, the number one supplier of crude oil to the United States is Canada, which accounts for about 10% of our yearly consumption. It is supplied on favorable terms under the NAFTA Agreement, which makes one ponder the logic of revising the wording of that treaty, at least in regard to oil imports. Major suppliers to the United States also include Mexico, Venezuela and Nigeria, the latter two being OPEC members.
For those who remember the oil shocks more than thirty years ago, OPEC was in its infancy, and we may have looked begrudgingly down our noses at a group we considered a conglomeration of Nomadic Tribes. However, OPEC has evolved into a sophisticated organization whose pricing policies may be stated by Ministers, but whose actuaries are highly educated MBAs and PhDs primarily from western universities. OPEC does not control the international oil market, but it controls a sufficient share to influence the supply and, in turn, prices. If OPEC is pumping 20 million barrels a day and receiving over $130/barrel, there is no reason to increase its production and have the price fall precipitously. OPEC is pumping less oil but receiving more gross revenue. This is free market enterprise, an economic policy strongly supported by the United States.
The explosion of crude oil consumption and subsequent sharp price increases have caught most people by surprise. The burgeoning economies in China, India and Brazil, all of whom are oil importers, have experienced unprecedented expansion. Russia’s economy is also booming, but Russia is an oil exporter and currently rivals Saudi Arabia for the top spot in barrels/day exported.
In the Western economies, very little oil is used for power plant generation. In the United States only about 2% of generated power comes from oil. The main culprits are automobile and truck consumption followed by heating oil and jet fuel. The new mileage standards imposed by recent Congressional legislation will help, but the original mileage standards established a generation ago excluded light trucks and SUVs, gas guzzlers that will continue to dominate our roadways for many years to come.
If it is bad now it should get worse: To pardon a pun, the fuel has yet to be added to the fire. Crude oil is the most internationalized commodity, and consumption throughout the world will continually have a direct bearing on our price at the pump. Brazil, China and Russia are adding about one million cars each to their roads every year. By various means, other developing economies are promoting an automobile for every driveway. In China and a number of other emerging economies, gasoline is subsidized by the government to keep it affordable and to promote automobile purchases. India, China and a number of Asian countries are constructing car factories that will produce vehicles with a price point between $2500 and $7000. This will make automobiles even more accessible to many more people and obviously further strain the already finite supply of oil. American automobile companies are parties to these projects, and if their sales are plummeting in America, their foreign operations will certainly compensate for their faltering domestic production. Our domestic price of gasoline directly reflects the growing worldwide demand for crude oil, which will only exacerbate the stress on supplies in the future. More cars on the road in every country will translate to higher prices at our local service stations.
Statistically, the amount of oil consumed in the United States has not increased dramatically during the last three decades. Due to our own shrinking domestic supply and the inability to tap new fields, we have had little choice but to supplement our needs through foreign sources. This puts us in the world market as competitors with every other country that has to rely either fully or in part upon imports. If the United States were totally sufficient for her oil needs, there may be pressure taken off of the international market. This would not necessarily guarantee a price reduction for gasoline as we live in a free market system and the value would still be determined in the global marketplace.
Crude oil is fungible and an increase in production in one area will not necessarily have a large impact on the worldwide supply/demand curve, especially with demand on a course of constantly exceeding supply. There has not been a new oil refinery built in the United States within the last three decades, and as a nation we import not only crude oil, but also gasoline, diesel and jet fuel. Regrettably, the shiploads of refined products are often from countries and areas that have proven to be unreliable long-term allies, thus making our future supplies uncertain and subject to geopolitical events.
If the United States continues with the current national energy policy we will remain hostage to the vagaries of the international oil market or will allow our energy situation to become increasingly precarious. In that case, we will always be reactive instead of proactive in dealing with our energy needs in the face of costly supplies. Under the circumstances, there is only one way to travel for the near future and that is through conservation inspired by intelligent leadership or conservation that happens naturally once gasoline hits $5.00/gallon.
May 22, 2008 at 10:47 pm |
Crude Complexities is an apt name for this posting about the underlying reasons we are paying nearly $4 a gallon for gas and will probably be paying even more soon. I suppose this is the wake-up call for an American society that’s been asleep at the wheel for too long, when it comes to the real cost of driving.
Lou, can you elaborate on this, “Statistically, the amount of oil consumed in the United States has not increased dramatically during the last three decades.” We really aren’t using much more oil than 30 years ago? That’s an amazing piece of information.
May 26, 2008 at 3:37 pm |
Dear Shanna,
My statement was a bit misleading as the amount of crude oil refined in the United States has not increased dramatically in the last three decades and that is solely due to refinery capacity. The amount of imported gasoline and other refined products have increased substantially.
Gasoline prices may mitigate in the short term, but I foresee only a continual upward spiral long term.
Regards,
Lou
May 28, 2008 at 4:39 am |
The only point that I would disagree with is that light trucks and SUVs will continue to dominate for years. From what I have read, if people have a gas guzzler and a more fuel efficient vehicle, they are leaving the gas hog in the garage and driving the more fuel efficient vehicle. The trade in value of the gas hogs has plummeted. Sales of motor scooters are increasing and more people are using public transit.
A recent column by Thomas Friedman said that the greatest failure of George Bush was not encouraging energy conservation and alternative energy research after 9/11; we are now funding the terrorists with our petroleum purchases.
May 28, 2008 at 4:25 pm |
Dear Mike,
Obviously the sales of light trucks and SUV’s has plummeted but there are millions of recent models still on the road or in dealer’s lots. There is a price point at which people will continue to buy and use them until they become manufacturer’s relics. Not everyone has the luxury of more than one vehicle in their garage nor access to public transportation.
Thomas Friedman made the same point in his book THE WORLD IS FLAT which was published in 2005. It is easy to be retrospective about the failings of the Bush Administration, but Friedman did not come to his conclusion on September 12, 2001 but only 4 years after 9/11. The United States has been consuming approximately 25% of the world’s energy for the last four decades. During that time, through Republican and Democratic Presidents and Congresses, nothing of substance has evolved from either the Legislative or Executive branches to address our finite energy resources.
I would like to believe alternative energy and conservation become the equivalent of the Manhattan Project for the next Administration.
Best regards,
Lou
July 9, 2008 at 9:17 pm |
Lou:
Re your recycling blog. I agree that a deposit should reduce discarded recyclables. Before merchants are required to take back recyclables, there should be an analysis to see if it makes sense or devise an economic and environmentally sound way of doing it. Constructing storage space for returned materials and then shipping it takes energy and resources.
As far as catalogs, there are web sites and phone numbers to call to get removed from catalog lists. I think the Direct Marketing Association has a site. Once you do that and you still get a catalog, you can contact the mailer and ask to be removed.
Mike
July 10, 2008 at 2:37 pm |
Dear Mike,
The web site for opting out of catalogs is http://www.catalogchoice.org although some claim it is not always successful.
The economics of recycling aluminum cans is obvious. Aluminum starts with bauxite ore that is brought to smelters via large cargo ships that leave a huge carbon footprint. Bauxite is converted to alumina that is subsequently processed to aluminum. This requires enormous and intensive energy and power. The same is true for steel that is produced with iron ore.
The amount of energy required to convert aluminum cans back to a usable product is less than 10% of that needed to refine/smelt bauxite. It is a very similar equation for steel cans or scrap being converted back to a finished product. I am not sure about the economics for glass and cardboard.
Responding to your earlier comment about gas guzzlers quickly disappearing from the road – this will hopefully happen sooner than later. I did some research concerning the useful life of cars in America and I was surprised to discover the average life is currently 16.8 years. It may take nearly a generation to purge ourselves of Hummers and I hope I am around to see it.
Regards,
Lou